Source: 22 Passi, Daniele Passerini (“Galantini sent it to Levi and Levi sent it to me.”)
Data: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:02:22 +0200
Da: Greit Service srl
Rispondi-A:Greit Service srl [omissis]
A: [omissis]
Buon giorno, in merito alla richiesta fattami in data odierna, come da me ripetutamente confermato alle numerose persone che me ne hanno fatto richiesta in passato, ripeto che tutte le mie misurazioni effettuate durante le decine di test per misurare la quantità di acqua non evaporata presente nel vapore prodotto dai generatori “E-Cat” sono sempre state effettuate dando i risultati in % di massa poiché lo strumento utilizzato indica i gr. di acqua per mc. di vapore.
Confermo che la temperatura misurata è sempre stata maggiore di 100,1°C.
E che la pressione misurata nel camino è sempre risultata essere pari alla pressione ambiente.
Lo strumento utilizzato durante il test effettuato alla presenza dei professori svedesi è stato il seguente: Testo 176 H2 codice 0572 1766.
Distinti saluti.
Galantini dr. Gilberto
Ordine dei Chimici n.194
Provincia di Ferrara
Date: Mon, 20 Jun 2011 14:02:22 +0200
From: Greit Service Ltd.
Reply-To: Greit Service Ltd. [snip]
A: [snip]
Good morning, on the request made to me today, as I have repeatedly confirmed to me that many people have requested in the past, I repeat that all the measurements I did, during tens of tests done to measure the amount of not evaporated water (read liquid water, TN) present in the steam produced by “E-Cat” generators, always was made providing results in “% of mass”, since the used device indicates the grams of water by cubic meter of steam.
I confirm that the measured temperature always was higher than 100,1°C and that the measured pression in the chimney always was equal to the ambient pressure.
The instrument used during the tests performed in the presence of Swedish teachers was as follows: 176 Text Code 0572 H2 1766 .
Yours sincerely.
Galantini dr.Gilberto
Order No. 194 of Chemical
Province of Ferrara
Message from Celani from January:
Data: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 19:15:26 +0100
Da: Francesco Celani
Rispondi-A:Francesco Celani
Oggetto: Declaration of Dr. Galantini (In Italian). [Fwd: sonda]
A: [omissis]@googlegroups.com
Cc: [omissis]
Dear Colleagues,
as anticipated, I am sending copy of the “Declaration” of Dr. Galantini about the instrumentation used.
I received it just now and it is in Italian language.
Thanks for Your kind attention,
Francesco CELANI
Oggetto: sonda
Data: Thu, 20 Jan 2011 18:56:41 +0100
Mittente: Greit Service srl <@greitservice.it>
A: <francesco.celani@
via Monsignore di Sotto, 32/A
44040 ALBERONE DI CENTO (FE)
C.F. e P. I.V.A. 02544400373
This is a better translation of the core part of Galantini e-mail:
[omissis], I repeat that all the measurements I did, during tens of tests done to measure the amount of not evaporated water (read liquid water, TN) present in the steam produced by “E-Cat” generators, always was made providing results in “% of mass”, since the used device indicates the grams of water by cubic meter of steam.
I confirm that the measured temperature always was higher than 100,1°C and that the measured pression in the chimney always was equal to the ambient pressure.
[omissis]
That probe uses a capacitance measurement to determine the relative humidity. It is calibrated in air, to represent the partial pressure of water vapor in air, because presumably the amount of water vapor in air affects the permittivity. It is not at all clear how that measurement can be used to determine the amount of liquid water droplets in water vapor.
The permittivity of water vapor may be affected by the amount of mist entrained in it, but to use the probe to measure the amount of mist present would require that it be calibrated for that purpose.
It is not plausible that the conversion to steam goes from zero per cent at 99.9C to 100% at 100.1C in an instant, since there is a 7-fold difference in the necessary power transfer, and this requires a substantial increase in the temperature of the reactor. During that increase in power transfer, the RH reading, if it has any relevance, should change continuously. Does it?
At the very least the RH reading should *monitored* on a continuous basis (like the temperature) and *reported*. Without that, the claim of dry steam is not credible.
@steven
Yes, if the flow rate is 2.5-3 kg/h then the true output power is something between 2-2.5kW (if vapor is dry).
Because vapor is not dry but it’s wet, then the power output could be less than 1kW.
I have no problem to have published my name.
Referring to youtube video uploaded by StevenKrivit on 06/20/2011:
[Ed: http://blog.newenergytimes.com/posting-guidelines/ #3]
Well, I asked Mr. Rossi for Dr. Levi’s data when he did a run with a high enough water flow rate through the E-cat so that there would be water only and no steam, I asked for the flow rate of the cooling water, the delta-T and the time of each observation. Here’s the reply so far:
[Comment deleted. If New Energy Times readers want to follow Mr. Rossi's blog, they can go to his Web site.]
Referring to youtube video uploaded by StevenKrivit on 06/20/2011:
[Ed: http://blog.newenergytimes.com/posting-guidelines/ #3]