Mitchell Swartz, a longtime low-energy nuclear reaction researcher, claimed on his Web site that he and Peter Hagelstein, an associate professor of electrical engineering at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, performed a LENR excess-heat experiment as part of a “course on cold fusion at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.”

Mitchell Swartz
They claimed a heat output 10 times greater than the electrical power input.
“This JET Energy NANOR(TM) demonstrated a significant energy gain greater than 10,” Swartz wrote, “much larger than the previous open demonstration. This exhibition is also remarkable because it confirmed the role of the nanoengineered lattice in enabling the CF/LANR activity. It followed Hagelstein sharing his breakthrough explanatory theory of cold fusion during the first five days.”
However, Swartz did not reveal the power level of this demonstration. Another LENR researcher did.
The researcher, who learned about the demonstration from Swartz, told New Energy Times that the peak power output Swartz measured in that experiment was 18 milliWatts.
In his news article, Swartz did not provide any reference to a scientific paper or more data.
New Energy Times invited Swartz to comment by e-mail earlier today, but we did not receive a response.
Swartz bypassed scientific protocol when he announced his claim on his Web site before publishing a paper. Other LENR researchers have been more sensitive to scientific protocol, announcing their findings only after submitting their work to peer-reviewed journals, mainstream science conferences or mainstream scientific encyclopedias.

I may be missing something, but I don’t see the basis for using the word “misleading” in the headline.
It appears Mr. Swartz has claimed an energy output greater than 10 times the energy input. You cite “another LENR researcher” as a source for the power level of 18 milliwatts. These two circumstances aren’t mutually contradictory.
Is there background information not referenced in your blog post that supports the use of “misleading”? Or would you point out what I’m missing in your post? Thank you.
Hi Ridge Guy,
Thanks for your question. Yes, I think you’re missing something but I may have missed something too. For how long have you been following LENR research? How familiar are you with the field? That will help me understand your perspective. I just obtained more information about Swartz’s experiment and I have a follow-up article in the works.
Best regards,
SBK